In this intriguing book, Hendrik Hartog uses a forgotten 1840 case to
explore the regime of gradual emancipation that took place in New Jersey
over the first half of the nineteenth century. In Minna's case, white
people fought over who would pay for the costs of caring for a
dependent, apparently enslaved, woman. Hartog marks how the peculiar
language mobilized by the debate--about care as a "mere voluntary
courtesy"--became routine in a wide range of subsequent cases about
"good Samaritans." Using Minna's case as a springboard, Hartog explores
the statutes, situations, and conflicts that helped produce a regime
where slavery was usually but not always legal and where a supposedly
enslaved person may or may not have been legally free.
In exploring this liminal and unsettled legal space, Hartog sheds light
on the relationships between moral and legal reasoning and a legal
landscape that challenges simplistic notions of what it meant to live in
freedom. What emerges is a provocative portrait of a distant legal order
that, in its contradictions and moral dilemmas, bears an ironic
resemblance to our own legal world.