In this innovative exploration of the concept of formality, or governing
by abstraction, Arthur Stinchcombe breathes new life into an idea that
scholars have all but ignored in recent years.
We have come to assume that governing our social activities by advance
planning--by creating abstract descriptions of what ought to happen and
adjusting these descriptions as situations change--is not as efficient
and responsive as dealing directly with the real substance of the
situation at hand. Stinchcombe argues the opposite. When a plan is
designed to correct itself and keep up with the reality it is meant to
govern, it can be remarkably successful. He points out a wide range of
examples where this is the case, including architectural blueprints,
immigration law, the construction of common law by appeals courts,
Fannie Mae's secondary mortgage market, and scientific paradigms and
programs.
Arguing that formality has been misconceived as consisting mainly of its
defects, Stinchcombe shows how formality, at its best, can serve us much
better than ritual obedience to poorly laid plans or a romantic appeal
to real life.